Antenna Dipole Calculator
Calculate half-wave dipole antenna dimensions. Determine element length, impedance, and radiation pattern.
Key Formulas
λ = c/f
Half-wave = λ/2 × VF
Each arm = λ/4 × VF
Frequently Asked Questions
What does the Antenna Dipole Calculator compute?
This tool calculates the physical length of a half-wave dipole antenna (total and per-arm), its theoretical feed-point impedance (~73 Ω in free space), and estimates radiation pattern characteristics. It accounts for velocity factor and wire diameter to improve real-world accuracy over idealized formulas.
When should I use this calculator in my RF design workflow?
Use it during antenna prototyping, PCB layout (for printed dipoles), or field-deployed wireless systems (e.g., LoRaWAN, RFID, ISM-band radios). It’s especially helpful when selecting resonant lengths for custom antennas before simulation or measurement.
What is the Velocity Factor (VF), and why does it matter?
Velocity Factor represents the reduction in signal propagation speed along a conductor due to insulation and proximity effects — typically 0.95–0.99 for bare wire in air, and ~0.66–0.85 for insulated or coaxial-fed dipoles. Lower VF shortens the required physical length for resonance.
What typical values should I enter for Wire Diameter?
For standard copper wire: 1–3 mm (AWG 12–18); for PCB traces: 0.5–2 mm; for tubing (e.g., aluminum elements): 6–12 mm. Diameter affects bandwidth and impedance slightly — larger diameters yield broader bandwidth and lower Q, but the calculator uses empirical corrections only for moderate ranges.
Why is my calculated dipole length shorter than λ/2?
Because real-world dipoles exhibit end effects—capacitive coupling at tips lowers resonant frequency, requiring physical shortening. The calculator applies a standard ~5% reduction from λ/2 (adjusted by VF and diameter) to achieve resonance at the target frequency.
Can I use this calculator for folded dipoles or off-center-fed dipoles?
No — this tool is optimized specifically for standard center-fed, straight-wire half-wave dipoles. Folded dipoles have ~4× higher impedance (~300 Ω), and OCF dipoles require different modeling; use dedicated calculators or EM simulation for those configurations.
How accurate are the impedance and bandwidth estimates?
The calculator assumes free-space operation and gives a nominal impedance near 73 Ω. Real impedance varies with height above ground, nearby objects, and conductor thickness. Bandwidth is approximated using standard Q-factor relationships — for precise matching, always verify with a VNA or simulator.
What frequency range is appropriate for this calculator?
Best suited for HF through UHF (3 MHz – 3 GHz). Below 3 MHz, ground losses and size become dominant; above 3 GHz, manufacturing tolerances, skin effect, and parasitic coupling significantly impact performance beyond the scope of this simplified model.
Do I need to adjust the result if mounting the dipole near metal or inside an enclosure?
Yes — proximity to conductive surfaces detunes the antenna, usually lowering resonant frequency and distorting the pattern. This calculator assumes ideal free-space conditions. For enclosed or constrained deployments, reduce the initial length by 2–5% and fine-tune empirically or simulate.
How does this relate to balun selection?
A dipole’s balanced 73-Ω feed-point impedance ideally interfaces with a 1:1 current balun to suppress common-mode currents on the feedline. If using coax (unbalanced), a balun is essential — the calculator doesn’t size baluns, but its impedance output helps select appropriate impedance-matching types (e.g., 4:1 for folded dipoles).